An Alternative Theory

So far in this series we’ve established that

  • science works under an assumption of naturalism;
  • the lack of alternative models makes evolutionary theory seem more certain than it is; and
  • the alternative models proposed so far by Creationists have not been very successful.

Now let’s elaborate on the question of how to study a supernatural phenomenon like Creation using methodological naturalism.

Even when something is created supernaturally, it still ends up natural at some point and is therefore subject to science. Moreover, something created supernaturally should have more in common with something that was created by an intelligent natural entity as opposed to something that developed entirely through inanimate natural causes.

I am going to use a very simplistic illustration to get this point across. Suppose a little girl is walking on a beach after a storm and finds a mound of sand sculpted by the wind and waves. She decides to build another mound just like it. And let’s suppose that after the girl leaves, some supernatural entity comes along and supernaturally creates a third mound next to the other two. If a scientist finds all three mounds and decides to research their origin, what would that research reveal?

Chances are that unless this supernatural entity used another storm to build that third mound, it will have more in common with the one built by the little girl than with the one that resulted from natural causes.

intelligentvsnatural

Now this does not mean I am making a definitive claim here; there is no way to know for sure if that would be the case. I am just saying that overall this would be a safe guess to make. And this could provide a rationale for us to look into the possibility of natural intelligent involvement in the development of life on earth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *